Council rejects redevelopment of neighbourhood 'blight'

Plans to redevelop a set of rundown and underused buildings have been shot down by the council, despite the developer describing the current site as a ‘blight’ on the neighbourhood.
Council rejects redevelopment of neighbourhood 'blight'Council rejects redevelopment of neighbourhood 'blight'
Council rejects redevelopment of neighbourhood 'blight'

Livingston-based property developer Emmanuel Ebeh has submitted plans to demolish the 1960s-era commercial properties at 56 Saughton Mains Gardens and replace them with a set of 38 modern flats and retail units.

Together with Saughton residents Kiran Bala and Mandeep Bassi, Mr Ebeh has formed the limited company Manbay Homes, which submitted plans to Edinburgh City Council planners in March of this year.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The plans would see 12 one-bedroom apartments, 23 two-bedroom apartments and three three-bedroom apartments, together with class one retail units and a hot food takeaway store.

Council rejects redevelopment of neighbourhood 'blight'Council rejects redevelopment of neighbourhood 'blight'
Council rejects redevelopment of neighbourhood 'blight'

Currently, the site is occupied by a convenience store and takeaway.

However, in September, council officers rejected the planning application, citing concerns, includingthe development of the adjacent land, the impact on the neighbourhood and the fact that the need for affordable housing has not been addressed.

Mr Ebeh appealed to the council’s local review body, which met on Wednesday, November 4, to discuss the proposals.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

An appeal statement, submitted to councillors ahead of the meeting, reads: “It has been very difficult for the appellant to comprehend how such a comprehensively negative assessment has been made at a point where the appellant was seeking to resolve small matters of issue relating to roads and drainage at a very late stage in the proceedings.

“Failure to allow this site to progress independently will only prove to prolong the blight of this area.

“It is therefore hoped that this review will agree that it is important that this development be permitted to proceed and to recognise the significant benefits that it will bring to the area.”

Council planning officers also produced a report ahead of the meeting, outlining their recommendation for refusal.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

It reads: “The proposal represents a poor quality design response to the site and local context, by virtue of its siting, layout, height, form, scale, proportions, material finishes, architectural detailing, design of private greenspace, public realm and landscaping.

“There are concerns regarding the quality of amenity for future residents including the large proportion of single aspect flats, level and nature of private greenspace and operation of commercial retail space at ground floor level.

“A noise assessment and affordable housing statement have not been provided and given the broader issues relating to design, amended information has not been requested from the applicant.”

Portobello and Craigmillar councillor Maureen Child, Labour, said: “There are a number of reasons for refusal, and there isn’t one I would reject.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“I think the officer recommendations are sound, I think it’s a ‘slam dunk’.”

Leith councillor Rob Munn, SNP, said: “The report makes a lot of negative comments regarding planning policy.

“That’s a real shame because what is there now is negative and it’s disappointing that the developer has dropped the ball, essentially.”

Councillors voted unanimously to refuse the planning application.

Joseph Anderson, Local Democracy Service

A message from the Editor:

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Thank you for reading this article. We're more reliant on your support than ever as the shift in consumer habits brought about by Coronavirus impacts our advertisers.

If you haven't already, please consider supporting our trusted, fact-checked journalism by taking out a digital subscription.

Related topics: